The Customer is Always Wrong

First off, I’m nervous as all get-out, as this is the first time I’ve guest-blogged and while I do blog over at Soft Skull News I think folks hold posts on this blog to a rather higher standard—longer and more discursive where appropriate; newsier, where appropriate; less hucksterism and shilling as always appropriate. So, having checked the previous sentence for grammar and stylistic balance, I’m ready to try to rise to the occasion, rather than dragging this blog down to my level.

OK so the title of the post. One the one hand, it’s the title of a book I’m publishing in a couple months, an anthology about working retail. I’m now rather optimistic about its prospects, having spent couple of years nervous about them—I’ve a shitty-assed track record with selling anthologies, unlike the proprietor of this here website. But the editor, Jeff Martin, is doing everything right, and we’re getting far more media and bookseller interest than I’d expected…But!

The purpose of this post is not to pimp out that book, but to beg publishers to stop acting as if the customer is in fact always wrong. (Because, you know, the title, it’s a joke. A bit of comic relief for the frazzled retail worker in a society of instant gratification, low service wages, and an endemic sense of entitlement amongst the affluent.) But there is a real tendency in our business to treat the customer as this perverse, mysterious, gullible, arrogant, narrow-minded, slightly thick, imperceptive lug. We largely talk down to him, dumb down for her, expect the least, fear the worst, and generally leave it up to the retailer to figure out how to reach him or her—we’ll get the book onto their shelves, we’ll pay them some payola, and then it’s their problem.

Of course it’s not, and not just because we’re in the only business where 100% of the product can be returned for full credit. It’s because fundamentally a publisher’s job is to connect the writer to the reader. Not the book to the retailer, but the writer to the reader.

This is not to denigrate the retailer. (I posted recently on my own blog about how one needs to understand the retailers if one is to do business well.) I don’t at all believe in  cutting the retailer out, but if we understand our customers better, the retailers will be very happy.

My most recent experience of this had to do with a cover. These past few days I’ve gotten e-mail, tweets and Facebook messages from various folks in response to a request on the blog for feedback on a cover. My dilemma—I’d an intuition that an unorthodox approach (not using the title or author, just an image) might just appeal to customers.

But a number of colleagues got nervous. Part of it was the fear of bucking convention, sure but part of it also stemmed, I believe, from the tendency to not really think about our readers, who they are, what they look for, what their circumstances are. So, I asked them! A little research, very informal. Not market research, not a focus group, not crowdsourcing (well, maybe a little bit of all the forgoing) just a request for a response.

I was relieved to learn I wasn’t crazy, that the unorthodox cover worked, but once that relief wore off, I started to realize that far more reader interactions like that are necessary, that the conversation about books that goes on in our culture now, gorgeously exemplified by Jeff’s house here, needs also to be going on much, much more in the whole apparatus that surrounds the words, houses the words, frames the words, makes it more or less likely you’ll read the words. I’m sure most folks don’t want to see inside the sausage factory, but I’m betting there are far far more than we’re currently admitting to the sausage factory, and if we expect y’all to eat our damn sausages, we’re going to have to spend more time with you guys figuring out how best to make them.

(I wish I could show you the responses, but my ass can’t figure out how to turn the comments on on my blog, long story…If any of y’all have clicked through to where I ask, feel free to comment here, along with whatever other comments you might have to make.)

12 comments on “The Customer is Always Wrong

  1. Sir Tessa says:

    I’m of the opinion that you should take this blog where ever the hell you want to (’cause when you’ve finished making a mess of it, you can just hand it back to Jeff, heh).

    Interesting point raised. I think the sometimes insidious presence of the internet in daily life and the huge wealth of knowledge we take for granted has given rise to almost an expectation of transparency in production processes, that because we can watch the sausage go through the factory (blogs, news releases, articles & interviews and so on), it becomes a spectator sport of sorts. And what spectator doesn’t yell at the tv and make themselves known?

  2. I saw the book cover in question on your Soft Skull blog. I didn’t reply to it then because we thought a hurricane was coming and my wife wanted to unplug the computer. Everything turned out okay.

    So I’ll just reply here. If I saw that cover in a bookstore, I would definitely pick it up to see what it was about. The banana, of course, brings to mind Andy Warhol and the Velvet Underground so my curiosity would have been piqued. Peaked. No, I think piqued it the right word.

    I’m glad you are blogging here. I’ve been interested in the publishing industry for a long time, especially the kind of publisher who would think of a name like “Soft Skull.” I mean that in a good way.

  3. gerry says:

    I like the cover as well. I agree with wanting to cater to the customer, but as far as the cover goes, if you had to explain the visual gag, or redesign it for folks who wouldn’t get it, they probably aren’t that book’s customer anyway.

  4. gerry is right. if they don’t get the cover, they probably wouldn’t be interested in the book.

  5. dauxulley says:

    god resource Continue also

  6. Thank you so much..

  7. da Kasaba 6, Trt Çocuk oyunları, Kayu (caillou) oyunları, trt çocuk mancınık oyunu, cille, yarışçı arazi, savaş oyunları ve macera oyunları bulunmaktadır.

  8. edevlet says:

    Thank you for the source. I hope everyone takes advantage of this source. Very Useful Information sharing your blog. Expect posts and more. Thanks

  9. tr forum says:

    Great post, wonderful blog. Really enjoy it and added into my social bookmarks. Keep up the good work!

  10. Ferrari’s Felipe Massa was an unlikely pace-setter on the first day of action at the inaugural Indian Grand Prix with McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton fourth and Jenson Button sixth.

Comments are closed.