<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urban Fantasy Is All About Magic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/11/28/urban-fantasy-is-all-about-magic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/11/28/urban-fantasy-is-all-about-magic/</link>
	<description>Jeff VanderMeer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Teppo&#8217;s Unifying Theory of Urban Fantasy &#171; Bill Ectric&#8217;s Place</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/11/28/urban-fantasy-is-all-about-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-17188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Teppo&#8217;s Unifying Theory of Urban Fantasy &#171; Bill Ectric&#8217;s Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/?p=2643#comment-17188</guid>
		<description>[...] Read entire article Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Bright of the SkyWorld Fantasy 2008: Part II [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read entire article Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Bright of the SkyWorld Fantasy 2008: Part II [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ectric</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/11/28/urban-fantasy-is-all-about-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-17167</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ectric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/?p=2643#comment-17167</guid>
		<description>Mark, as I mull over your highly-readable manifesto, I find a number of comment-worthy insights and observations, but I can&#039;t seem to zero in on what I want to say. I think it&#039;s because you have identified a line between two genres, or sub-genres, which makes me question my own literary intent. That&#039;s not a bad thing at all, it just makes me wonder if I need to choose more specifically which genre I really am.

I could claim the gray area, but I don&#039;t want to cop out and straddle the paradigm fence. Henry James, when asked if &lt;i&gt;The Turn of the Screw&lt;/i&gt; was a psychological thriller, replied that it was simply a ghost story. I have always thought that it was both. To me, Shelley&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Frankenstein&lt;/i&gt; is more science fiction than fantasy, as is much of H. P. Lovecraft&#039;s lore about ancient aliens and devolving fish people. But at least Lovecradt presented those creatures as real, not imagined, in the context of the stories. Now I guess I&#039;m just thinking out loud. See what you&#039;ve done? You made me think!. I&#039;m just not sure yet of my conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, as I mull over your highly-readable manifesto, I find a number of comment-worthy insights and observations, but I can&#8217;t seem to zero in on what I want to say. I think it&#8217;s because you have identified a line between two genres, or sub-genres, which makes me question my own literary intent. That&#8217;s not a bad thing at all, it just makes me wonder if I need to choose more specifically which genre I really am.</p>
<p>I could claim the gray area, but I don&#8217;t want to cop out and straddle the paradigm fence. Henry James, when asked if <i>The Turn of the Screw</i> was a psychological thriller, replied that it was simply a ghost story. I have always thought that it was both. To me, Shelley&#8217;s <i>Frankenstein</i> is more science fiction than fantasy, as is much of H. P. Lovecraft&#8217;s lore about ancient aliens and devolving fish people. But at least Lovecradt presented those creatures as real, not imagined, in the context of the stories. Now I guess I&#8217;m just thinking out loud. See what you&#8217;ve done? You made me think!. I&#8217;m just not sure yet of my conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
