Coulter’s bilious rantings don’t mean shit outside the US; I know who she is but I could spend days mentioning her to fellow Brits without receiving a glimmer of recognition. Palin, on the other hand, has been placed in a position where she could seriously fuck up the world for all of us. More dangerous and worrying by several orders of magnitude.
Wait a minute–I didn’t say that Coulter was more *dangerous* than Palin, just that she was more evil (as verified by the kind folks at Evilometrics, a division of the RAND Corporation).
And think of this… as screwy as Palin is, what if Ann Coulter were a serious contender for the US presidency?
Ah… *NOW* you see what I’m talking about?
(I mean, at least Palin has five children and has taken care of them. Reports vary, but apparently Coulter swallows her own eggs after her 7-year spawn cycle.)
But Palin has the POTENTIAL to become a Coulter. You telling me she won’t become a fixture on FOX if she loses? Our only hope is that the two meet and destroy each other in a fiery conflict, like badgers protecting their den.
Ok, while the first badger is definitely exuding that Coulteresque tenacity, that second one is disturbingly sexual. Considering we are discussing two of the most erection-wilting ladies in the western hemisphere, I think it’s out of place.
Now, as to DVDs, I’m sure we could get some interest, even on FOX. They’ll show anything.
9 comments on “I’m not sayin’, but I’m just sayin’…”
I could wax poetical about any reference to King of the Hill, because it is based on my hometown, and haunts me with the similarities.
In this case, however, sir, you are incorrect.
Sarah Palin is a brunette Ann Coulter.
Look, I know Sarah Palin is evil, but Ann Coulter? I mean, is ANYONE as evil as Ann Coulter?
Really, I’m not being rhetorical, I’m asking, is that scientifically possible?
I think Palin is far more dangerous than Coulter. Anyone who goes in for Jews for Jesus just right away goes on my evil list.
Coulter’s bilious rantings don’t mean shit outside the US; I know who she is but I could spend days mentioning her to fellow Brits without receiving a glimmer of recognition. Palin, on the other hand, has been placed in a position where she could seriously fuck up the world for all of us. More dangerous and worrying by several orders of magnitude.
Wait a minute–I didn’t say that Coulter was more *dangerous* than Palin, just that she was more evil (as verified by the kind folks at Evilometrics, a division of the RAND Corporation).
And think of this… as screwy as Palin is, what if Ann Coulter were a serious contender for the US presidency?
Ah… *NOW* you see what I’m talking about?
(I mean, at least Palin has five children and has taken care of them. Reports vary, but apparently Coulter swallows her own eggs after her 7-year spawn cycle.)
But Palin has the POTENTIAL to become a Coulter. You telling me she won’t become a fixture on FOX if she loses? Our only hope is that the two meet and destroy each other in a fiery conflict, like badgers protecting their den.
I think we need to feed the data into the Evilometer (TM).
Corey, you are the freaking man. Okay, how do we arrange this fiery badger battle? And can we sell DVDs of “Badgers Gone Wild (on Fire)”?
Here are two pictures of our contestants:
http://lauriekendrick.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/badger2.jpg
http://www.furry.org.au/badger/gallery/w_badger.jpg
Ok, while the first badger is definitely exuding that Coulteresque tenacity, that second one is disturbingly sexual. Considering we are discussing two of the most erection-wilting ladies in the western hemisphere, I think it’s out of place.
Now, as to DVDs, I’m sure we could get some interest, even on FOX. They’ll show anything.
Comments are closed.