<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Thoughts on Two Current Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/</link>
	<description>Jeff VanderMeer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timblynod</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7548</link>
		<dc:creator>Timblynod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7548</guid>
		<description>Kameron: I prefer the word *plod* along. It&#039;s very ploddy sounding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kameron: I prefer the word *plod* along. It&#8217;s very ploddy sounding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kameron Hurley</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7526</link>
		<dc:creator>Kameron Hurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7526</guid>
		<description>Never said I begrudged Scalzi (why on earth would I begrudge Scalzi? He works his ass off, and has been doing so for years, as have many writers who make a whole lot less). Just saying that after seeing that way out there point on the graph, it made realize (in the wake of my own deal) that all we tend to see, publicly, are the folks who&#039;ve signed the huge advances, who are raking in the most money. 

It had a bearing on my decision to post about the numbers of my own deal (a first deal, and I&#039;m ten years younger than Scalzi, which also had a bearing on my numbers. In 10 years I could very well be making $164K a year writing, especially if I still have a corp writing day job). I felt it would benefit my readers, at least, to know the kind of first deal that I got with the experience I&#039;ve got. Helps with expectations. Again, we all *say* we *know* that we&#039;re not *expecting* to get a 6-figure first book advance, but we do all secretly *hope* for it right out of the gate. 

I think I&#039;ll get there. Just not... yeah, right out of the gate. All of us start small. It&#039;s worth keeping in mind while you trudge along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never said I begrudged Scalzi (why on earth would I begrudge Scalzi? He works his ass off, and has been doing so for years, as have many writers who make a whole lot less). Just saying that after seeing that way out there point on the graph, it made realize (in the wake of my own deal) that all we tend to see, publicly, are the folks who&#8217;ve signed the huge advances, who are raking in the most money. </p>
<p>It had a bearing on my decision to post about the numbers of my own deal (a first deal, and I&#8217;m ten years younger than Scalzi, which also had a bearing on my numbers. In 10 years I could very well be making $164K a year writing, especially if I still have a corp writing day job). I felt it would benefit my readers, at least, to know the kind of first deal that I got with the experience I&#8217;ve got. Helps with expectations. Again, we all *say* we *know* that we&#8217;re not *expecting* to get a 6-figure first book advance, but we do all secretly *hope* for it right out of the gate. </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll get there. Just not&#8230; yeah, right out of the gate. All of us start small. It&#8217;s worth keeping in mind while you trudge along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7483</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7483</guid>
		<description>Kameron: I&#039;m kind of surprised people see Scalzi&#039;s blog post as &quot;triumphant.&quot; I mean, we&#039;re all aware that John Scalzi is one of the most successful authors of science fiction currently writing, right? He&#039;s a best seller. He&#039;s an absolute exception. All sorts of readers buy and enjoy his books. And he&#039;s still making less than your average corporate lawyer (with a few years&#039; experience), or plastic surgeon, or upper-level manager, or anyone on Wall Street. The fact that his income is significant doesn&#039;t surprise me - I *knew* he was extraordinarily successful. But there are lots and lots of professions whose most successful practitioners make a lot more than $160k. It&#039;s actually kind of sobering to realize that, even hitting the writing jackpot as Scalzi has, the top fraction of a percent of published authors, he&#039;s not making enough to retire on - he&#039;s making enough to keep writing. How can we begrudge our top authors their success when that&#039;s what most writers are aspiring to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kameron: I&#8217;m kind of surprised people see Scalzi&#8217;s blog post as &#8220;triumphant.&#8221; I mean, we&#8217;re all aware that John Scalzi is one of the most successful authors of science fiction currently writing, right? He&#8217;s a best seller. He&#8217;s an absolute exception. All sorts of readers buy and enjoy his books. And he&#8217;s still making less than your average corporate lawyer (with a few years&#8217; experience), or plastic surgeon, or upper-level manager, or anyone on Wall Street. The fact that his income is significant doesn&#8217;t surprise me &#8211; I *knew* he was extraordinarily successful. But there are lots and lots of professions whose most successful practitioners make a lot more than $160k. It&#8217;s actually kind of sobering to realize that, even hitting the writing jackpot as Scalzi has, the top fraction of a percent of published authors, he&#8217;s not making enough to retire on &#8211; he&#8217;s making enough to keep writing. How can we begrudge our top authors their success when that&#8217;s what most writers are aspiring to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff VanderMeer</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff VanderMeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7439</guid>
		<description>Kameron:

I honestly wasn&#039;t talking about you personally, just so you know. I just think that because blog memes spread so fast, no one has really thought out, or can see, the total effect, either way (and ultimately I might change my position, after the dust settles, so to speak). Me, I like knowing other people&#039;s incomes and them not knowing mine. :)  But, as I said before, I don&#039;t feel strongly about this one way or the other. I&#039;ve enjoyed reading the comments on the initial post. Although, again, any writer with an agent doesn&#039;t actually need this information--that&#039;s what they have the agent for, and also why Tobias Buckell does his surveys. 

JeffV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kameron:</p>
<p>I honestly wasn&#8217;t talking about you personally, just so you know. I just think that because blog memes spread so fast, no one has really thought out, or can see, the total effect, either way (and ultimately I might change my position, after the dust settles, so to speak). Me, I like knowing other people&#8217;s incomes and them not knowing mine. :)  But, as I said before, I don&#8217;t feel strongly about this one way or the other. I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading the comments on the initial post. Although, again, any writer with an agent doesn&#8217;t actually need this information&#8211;that&#8217;s what they have the agent for, and also why Tobias Buckell does his surveys. </p>
<p>JeffV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kameron Hurley</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7438</link>
		<dc:creator>Kameron Hurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7438</guid>
		<description>Like anything else, money revelations are a personal thing, yeah. After hearing Scalzi proclaim to the winds that he makes $164K a year writing, you know... It felt like a new-writer nicety to tell young writers that after 12 years of writing and subbing fiction, I was getting a 10K book advance. 

I do think that, as young writers, our expectations are really, really high. All you ever hear about in the media are the great bazillion dollar deals (which are usually crap books, coincidentally). Sure, we&#039;ve all read the &quot;averages,&quot; but when never expect that to be *us* or our *friends.* 

Hearing somebody&#039;s personal account, for me, is a lot more powerful than averages. Especially, again, after Scalzi&#039;s triumphant proclaimation. 

Again: totally personal decision, but that was the rational behind my disclosure, in any case. 

As an aside, my employer fires people for disclosing their income, which is the only reason I haven&#039;t stated in a non-LJ locked post how much I make a year at my writing day job. Again, my personal choice to share or not, like any other personal detail, but it&#039;s also useful for other copywriters to hear what other copywriters charge, too. And it means more to me, as a reader, when it comes from a personality I &quot;Know&quot; than when it&#039;s just la la averages. I&#039;ve sort of built my blog on sharing personal experiences in the hopes that they&#039;ll help others who go through the same stuff, tho, so it sorta goes with the theme of the blog. 

Is it always a good thing to disclose? Probably not. Like anything else, you look at what you&#039;re saying and who you&#039;re saying it to and weigh what the ramifications will be. Then you make the decision based on that. For me, the pros of what I wanted to do outweighed the cons (in the case of publically disclosing my work income, however, the pros DO NOT outweigh the cons, thus it remains a misty-hazy number somewhere between &quot;less than what I made in Chicago&quot; and &quot;more than subsistence level.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like anything else, money revelations are a personal thing, yeah. After hearing Scalzi proclaim to the winds that he makes $164K a year writing, you know&#8230; It felt like a new-writer nicety to tell young writers that after 12 years of writing and subbing fiction, I was getting a 10K book advance. </p>
<p>I do think that, as young writers, our expectations are really, really high. All you ever hear about in the media are the great bazillion dollar deals (which are usually crap books, coincidentally). Sure, we&#8217;ve all read the &#8220;averages,&#8221; but when never expect that to be *us* or our *friends.* </p>
<p>Hearing somebody&#8217;s personal account, for me, is a lot more powerful than averages. Especially, again, after Scalzi&#8217;s triumphant proclaimation. </p>
<p>Again: totally personal decision, but that was the rational behind my disclosure, in any case. </p>
<p>As an aside, my employer fires people for disclosing their income, which is the only reason I haven&#8217;t stated in a non-LJ locked post how much I make a year at my writing day job. Again, my personal choice to share or not, like any other personal detail, but it&#8217;s also useful for other copywriters to hear what other copywriters charge, too. And it means more to me, as a reader, when it comes from a personality I &#8220;Know&#8221; than when it&#8217;s just la la averages. I&#8217;ve sort of built my blog on sharing personal experiences in the hopes that they&#8217;ll help others who go through the same stuff, tho, so it sorta goes with the theme of the blog. </p>
<p>Is it always a good thing to disclose? Probably not. Like anything else, you look at what you&#8217;re saying and who you&#8217;re saying it to and weigh what the ramifications will be. Then you make the decision based on that. For me, the pros of what I wanted to do outweighed the cons (in the case of publically disclosing my work income, however, the pros DO NOT outweigh the cons, thus it remains a misty-hazy number somewhere between &#8220;less than what I made in Chicago&#8221; and &#8220;more than subsistence level.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel B</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7437</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7437</guid>
		<description>Agree 100 percent on the purple prose.  I think the bias against it seeps in from the belief that denser, less &quot;accessible&quot; writing is less commercial...and to a lot of experts, commercial writing is the only writing.

I must say though, for those who ARE interested in commercial writing, if the salary disclosure blogging has given aspiring writers a better understanding of what they can expect if they quit their day job, it&#039;s done some good.  And, rather than being pretentious, I think most are done in a fairly selfless spirit of demystifying an aspect of the craft that&#039;s not often discussed, at least not in concrete terms.  As long as they&#039;re honest in both the numbers and the time/work/luck it took to achieve them (and I haven&#039;t read any that I thought weren&#039;t) what&#039;s the harm in having access to more information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100 percent on the purple prose.  I think the bias against it seeps in from the belief that denser, less &#8220;accessible&#8221; writing is less commercial&#8230;and to a lot of experts, commercial writing is the only writing.</p>
<p>I must say though, for those who ARE interested in commercial writing, if the salary disclosure blogging has given aspiring writers a better understanding of what they can expect if they quit their day job, it&#8217;s done some good.  And, rather than being pretentious, I think most are done in a fairly selfless spirit of demystifying an aspect of the craft that&#8217;s not often discussed, at least not in concrete terms.  As long as they&#8217;re honest in both the numbers and the time/work/luck it took to achieve them (and I haven&#8217;t read any that I thought weren&#8217;t) what&#8217;s the harm in having access to more information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew C</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7366</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7366</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s kind of pretentious to reveal your salary, in my opinion.  As for purple prose, I agree that style is very important and it has to engage you.  Although, of course, I worry that my writing is too transparent or journalistic, though I think I DO have a style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s kind of pretentious to reveal your salary, in my opinion.  As for purple prose, I agree that style is very important and it has to engage you.  Although, of course, I worry that my writing is too transparent or journalistic, though I think I DO have a style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff VanderMeer</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff VanderMeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7358</guid>
		<description>Steve:
If I thought there were only positives to writers revealing their &quot;salaries,&quot; I&#039;d be all for it. I&#039;m just not convinced.
JV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve:<br />
If I thought there were only positives to writers revealing their &#8220;salaries,&#8221; I&#8217;d be all for it. I&#8217;m just not convinced.<br />
JV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff VanderMeer</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff VanderMeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7357</guid>
		<description>$27 million??!!! Can I be your accountant, Felix?

JV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$27 million??!!! Can I be your accountant, Felix?</p>
<p>JV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buchheit</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7356</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Buchheit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2008/02/16/a-few-thoughts-on-two-current-trends/#comment-7356</guid>
		<description>Coming from another creative endeavor (Graphic Design) I can tell you that having some salary surveys have helped bring equality of pay into that realm. Certainly, some designers are better than others, but typically designer at &quot;top shops&quot; earn significantly less (because they have the honor of working for the best). Well, when I was in &quot;Art&quot; School, my professors drummed the thoughts of &quot;Design is Art&quot; out of our heads. Design is a business. Still, most designers don&#039;t talk about what they make, and consider it gauche because we&#039;re all &quot;artists.&quot; BS, if I was an artist I would be doing photography, but I&#039;ve come to embrace the two luxuries I know and enjoy (eating and sleeping indoors), so I do design. When &quot;How Magazine&quot; and Aquent (formerly MacTemps) started publishing salary ranges and job descriptions, it changed the whole industry, mostly to the betterment of the designers. There are still many unfair practices out there in the market. Talking honestly about money, in my opinion, is a good thing.

The contrary to this is if you&#039;re talking about money in a less than honest, pissing contest kind of way, I don&#039;t care about it. That part is a stupid, cocktail-party game. One which usually ends we me coming up with the most clever variant of &quot;seems cheap to sell one&#039;s soul for such a paltry sum.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming from another creative endeavor (Graphic Design) I can tell you that having some salary surveys have helped bring equality of pay into that realm. Certainly, some designers are better than others, but typically designer at &#8220;top shops&#8221; earn significantly less (because they have the honor of working for the best). Well, when I was in &#8220;Art&#8221; School, my professors drummed the thoughts of &#8220;Design is Art&#8221; out of our heads. Design is a business. Still, most designers don&#8217;t talk about what they make, and consider it gauche because we&#8217;re all &#8220;artists.&#8221; BS, if I was an artist I would be doing photography, but I&#8217;ve come to embrace the two luxuries I know and enjoy (eating and sleeping indoors), so I do design. When &#8220;How Magazine&#8221; and Aquent (formerly MacTemps) started publishing salary ranges and job descriptions, it changed the whole industry, mostly to the betterment of the designers. There are still many unfair practices out there in the market. Talking honestly about money, in my opinion, is a good thing.</p>
<p>The contrary to this is if you&#8217;re talking about money in a less than honest, pissing contest kind of way, I don&#8217;t care about it. That part is a stupid, cocktail-party game. One which usually ends we me coming up with the most clever variant of &#8220;seems cheap to sell one&#8217;s soul for such a paltry sum.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
