Nathan Ballingrud: Slow But Magnificent

Jeff VanderMeer • August 16th, 2007 @ 9:37 pm • Uncategorized

This post by one of our most talented short story writers starts as a con report but then gets really interesting when he talks about the propensity to linger over word counts and productivity to the detriment of quality. Professional versus amateur indeed.

Personally, I think it’s more important to be engaged with your text on a daily basis than to worry too much about your daily word count. What do I mean by engaged? I mean fully involved and lost in it, thinking about it. Too many writers don’t think enough about their fiction before entering into it, and while working on it.

I think I wrote about 3,000 words on “Borne” today. Monday through Wednesday I wrote nothing on “Borne” but a few scribbled notes. But I was thinking about it quite a bit, really bearing down on it, for hours over those three days, and the result was that today’s words are, I think, the right ones. And so will the ones tomorrow and Saturday. Then I’ll probably have to think some other stuff through. I might only wind up averaging 300 words a day on Borne. But, like Nathan says, it doesn’t matter.

One Response to “Nathan Ballingrud: Slow But Magnificent”

  1. Nathan Ballingrud says:

    Exactly! I wish I’d thought to mention that engagement through just thinking about the story. For me anyway, it’s where most of the hard work actually gets done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>